Evaluation of educational environment in residents from general teaching hospital Carlos M. de Céspedes

Authors

  • Alexis Álvarez Aliaga HOSPITAL PROVINCIAL UNIVERSITARIO CARLOS M. DE CÉSPEDES. BAYAMO. GRANMA, CUBA
  • Rosa Ojeda Vázquez HOSPITAL PROVINCIAL UNIVERSITARIO CARLOS M. DE CÉSPEDES. BAYAMO. GRANMA, CUBA
  • Yacnira Bazán Martínez HOSPITAL PROVINCIAL UNIVERSITARIO CARLOS M. DE CÉSPEDES. BAYAMO. GRANMA, CUBA
  • Yisel Martínez García HOSPITAL PROVINCIAL UNIVERSITARIO CARLOS M. DE CÉSPEDES. BAYAMO. GRANMA, CUBA
  • Liliana R Maceo Gómez HOSPITAL PROVINCIAL UNIVERSITARIO CARLOS M. DE CÉSPEDES. BAYAMO. GRANMA, CUBA

Keywords:

social perception, education, medical, graduate, working environment.

Abstract

Introduction: educational environment is the set of conditions and feelings, which are experienced and perceived by students in a determined institutional context.
Objective: To evaluate the educational environment in the residents of the hospital Carlos Manuel de Céspedes.
Methods: an evaluative investigation was carried out for which the PHEEM (Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure) was used a specific instrument to evaluate the educational environment of the residents in the hospital context.
Results: the survey was applied to 120 (58.25 %) residents of the center of 206 in total; belonging to both genders. The 20 chairs of the hospital were represented. The overall average was 2.5333, indicating an educational environment with significant limitations. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.888 and an alpha of standardized items of 0.889, demonstrates reliability of the applied instrument.
Conclusion: the application of the survey was very useful in the diagnosis of the educational environment of the residents of the hospital, proving that there are important limitations, it would be necessary an investigation to compare with other hospitals in the province and the country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Galli A, Brissón ME, Soler C, Lapresa S, Alves de Lima A. Evaluación del ambiente educacional en residencias de cardiología. Rev Argent Cardiol [Internet]. 2014 [citado 14 Nov 2015]; 82:396-401. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1850-37482014000500008.

2. Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University student’s perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Stud Hig Educ [Internet]. 2002 [citado 14 Nov 2015]; 27(1):27-52. Disponible en: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c76d/69bbede71e1234b334ef1d7199ea813b5c8b.pdf.

3. Hutchison L. Educational environment. BMJ [Internet]. 2003 [citado 14 Nov 2015]; 326(7393): 810-2. Disponible en: http://www.bmj.com/content/326/7393/810 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7393.810.

4. Kaufman DM, Day V, Mensink D. Stressors in Medical School: Relation to Curriculum Format and Years of Study. Teach Learn Med. 1998; 10 (3):188-94.

5. Fraser BJ. Science learning environment: assessment, effects

and determinants [Internet]. En: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG, editors. International

Handbook of Science Education. Great Britain: Kluwer; 1998. p.

527-61 [citado 14 Nov 2015]. Disponible en: https://surveylearning.moodle.com/cles/papers/Handbook98.htm.

6. Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education-a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001; 23(4):337-44.

7. Gough J, Bullen M, Donath S. PHEEM “Downunder”. Med Teach. 2010; 32:161-3.

8. Llera J, Durante E. Correlación entre el clima educacional y el síndrome de desgaste profesional en los programas de residencia de un hospital universitario. Arch Argent Pediatr [Internet]. 2014 [citado 14 Nov 2015]; 112(1):e6-e11. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0325-00752014000100003.

9. Bris MM. Clima de trabajo y organizaciones que aprenden. Educar [Internet]. 2000 [citado 14 Nov 2015]; 27:103-17. Disponible en: http://www.raco.cat/index.php/Educar/article/download/20736/20576.

10. Herrera CA, Niklitschik I, Pizarro M, Solís N, Olivos T, Rojas V, et al. Evaluación del ambiente educacional en programas de especialización médica. Rev Med Chile [Internet]. 2012 [citado 16 Ene 2016]; 140: 1554-61. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872013000900004.

11. The Executive Council, The World Federation for Medical Education.International standards in medical education: assessment and accreditation of medical schools’-educational programmes. A WFME position paper. Med Educ [Internet]. 1998 [citado 16 Ene 2016]; 32 (5): 549-58. Disponible en: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00302.x/pdf.

12. Herrera C, Pacheco J, Rosso F, Cisterna C, Aichele D, Becker S, et al. Evaluation of the undergraduate educational environment in six medical schools in Chile. Rev Med Chile [Internet]. 2010 [citado 16 Ene 2016]; 138 (6): 677-84. Disponible en:

http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872010000600003.

13. Soemantri D, Herrera C, Riquelme A. Measuring the educational environment in health professions studies: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2010; 32 (12): 947-52.

14. Aspegren K, Bastholt L, Bested KM, Bonnesen T, Ejlersen E, Fog I, et al. Validation of the PHEEM instrument in a Danish hospital setting. Med Teach [Internet]. 2007 [citado 16 Ene 2016]; 29 (5): 498-500. Disponible en: http://www.ouh.dk/dwn435466.pdf.

15. Boor K, Scheele F, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ, Teunissen PW, Sijtsma K. Psychometric properties of an instrument to measure the clinical learning environment. Med Educ [Internet]. 2007 [citado 16 Ene 2016]; 41 (1): 92-9.Disponible en: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02651.x/full.

16. Morales A, Medina AM. Percepción del alumno de pregrado de medicina, acerca del ambiente educativo en el IMSS. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social 2007. Rev Med Inst Seguro Soc [Internet]. 2007 [citado 09 Feb 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/imss/im-2007/im072e.pdf.

17. Riquelme A, Herrera C, Aranis C, Oporto J, Padilla O. Psychometric analyses and internal consistency of the PHEEM questionnaire to measure the clinical learning environment in the clerkship of a Medical School in Chile. Med Teach. 2009; 31(6):e221-5.

18. Vieira JE. The postgraduate hospital educational environment measure (PHEEM) questionnaire identifies quality of instruction as a key factor predicting academic achievement. Clinics [Internet]. 2008 [citado 09 Feb 2016]; 63:741-6. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2664272/.

19. Al-hazimi A, Zaini R, Al-hyiani A, Hassan N, Gunaid A, Ponnamperuma G, et al. Educational environment in traditional and innovative medical schools: a study in four undergraduate medical schools. Education for Health. 2004; 17(2):192–203.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-02

How to Cite

1.
Álvarez Aliaga A, Ojeda Vázquez R, Bazán Martínez Y, Martínez García Y, Maceo Gómez LR. Evaluation of educational environment in residents from general teaching hospital Carlos M. de Céspedes. RM [Internet]. 2017 May 2 [cited 2025 Jun. 4];21(1):21-40. Available from: https://revmultimed.sld.cu/index.php/mtm/article/view/458

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2017)

Section

ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES

License

Avisos de derechos de autor propuestos por Creative Commons

1. Política propuesta para revistas que ofrecen acceso abierto

Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
  1. Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
  2. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
  3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).