Peritoneal biopsy as criteria to interrupt programed peritoneal lavage

Authors

  • Ernesto Sánchez Castillo HOSPITAL CLÍNICO QUIRÚRGICO MUNICIPAL DOCENTE “COMANDANTE FÉLIX LUGONES RAMÍREZ” PILÓN
  • Francisco Vargas La O HOSPITAL CLÍNICO QUIRÚRGICO MUNICIPAL DOCENTE “COMANDANTE FÉLIX LUGONES RAMÍREZ” PILÓN
  • Balbina Domínguez Viltres HOSPITAL CLÍNICO QUIRÚRGICO MUNICIPAL DOCENTE “COMANDANTE FÉLIX LUGONES RAMÍREZ” PILÓN

Keywords:

PERITONITIS /pathology, PERITONEUM /pathology, PERITONEAL LAVAGE, BIOPSY

Abstract

Management of Acute infectious peritonitis constitute a health problem in medical grounds. A descriptive, prospective study was made on 42 with this infection submitted to programmed peritoneal lavages at teaching surgical hospital “Felix Lugones Ramírez”, from February 2002 to December 2007, from which there were taken peritoneal samples at the beginning of peritoneal lavages, and at the end of them to determine biopsy values as criteria to end lavages. All peritoneal biopsies after beginning programmed peritoneal lavages showed elements of acute inflammation, coinciding with major percentage of bad general conditions (39: 82,86%), and local (42: 100%) in patients, intra-abdominal pressure was elevated (IV degree 39: 92,86%) because infection persistence. The majority of peritoneal biopsies done at the suspension of programmed peritoneal lavages informed healing elements showing coincidence with major percentage of general good conditions (39: 92,86%), negative peritoneal liquid culture (42: 100%). The major number of

biopsies with healing elements (32: 76,20%) was informed in patients receiving from 7 to 10 reinterventions as minimum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Dietmar H Wittmann, Alonzo P, Walber y Robert E. Condon. Peritonitis e infección intrabdominal. En: Schwartz. Principios de Cirugía. 6ta. Ed. Mexico: Interamericana, 2000:1493-1525 .

2. Ojeda Ojeda MI. Peritonitis generalizadas. Trabajo para optar la categoría de Especialista de 2do Grado en Cirugía General. Hospital “Carlos M. de Céspedes”. Bayamo. Granma. Cuba. May; 2001.

3. Kooi K, Bleichrodt RP. Local treatment of generalised peritonitis in rats; effects on bacteria, endotoxin and mortality. Eur I Surg. 2003. 165(11) : 1072-9 .

4. Jacobs S, Sobki S, Morais C, Taring M. Effect of pentaglobin and piperacillin on survival in a rat model of faecal peritonitis : importance of intervention timings . Acta Anaesthesial Scand. 2003; 44(1) : 1072-9

5. Stanley L. Robbins, MD. Y otros. Inflamación y reparación. En su Patología Estructural y Funcional. 3era.ed. N . Edit. Interam. 2000. p . 39-85.

6. Sugrue M, Iones F, Ianjua KI, Deane SA, Bristo P, Hillman K . Temporary abdominal clasure : a prospective avaluation of its effects on renal and respiratory physiology. I. Trauma. 2004; 45(5) : 914-21 .

7. Saggi BH, Sugerman HI, Ivatury RR, Bloomfield GL. Abdominal comportment syndrome. I. Trauma. 2004; 45 (3): 597-609 .

8. Friedlander MH, Simon, Ivatury R, Di Raimo R, Machiedo GW. Effect of hemorrhage on superior mesenteric artery flaw during increased intrabdominal pressures. I. Trauma. 2003; 45(3): 433-89.

9. Aragón Palmero, F. y otros. Nuevos conceptos en cirugía: Síndrome del comportamiento abdominal. Rev. Cub. Cir. 2003; 38(1): 30-5.

10. Benham I, Cótele CI, Papaglonopolos C. Abdominal comporment syndrome. I. Trauma. 2004; 38: 152-3 .

11. Iochum M, Billing AG, Frohlich D, Schildberg FW, Mac Hleidt W, Cheronis IC, Gippner Steppert C, Fritx H. Proteolytic destruction of functional proteins by phagocytes in human peritonitis. Eur I Clin Invest. 2003; 29(3): 246-55 .

12. Plank LD, Connolly AB, Hill GL . Sequential changes in the metabolic response in severely septic patients during the first 23 days ofter the onset of peritonitis. Ann. Surg . 2002; 228(2): 146-58 .

13. Kaperna F, Schulz TFI. Relaparotonmys in peritonitis: prognosis an treatment of patients with persisting intrabdominal infection. World I Surg. 2000; 24(1): 32-7

14. Breborowicr A, Polubinska A, Moberly I, Ogle K, Martiz L, Oreopoulos D. Hyaluronan modifies inflammatory response and peritoneal permeabilty during peritonitis in rats . Am I Kidney Dis. 2000; 37; (3): 594-600.

15. De Wilde IP, Lebrun E, Bournonville B, Kinnaert P. Surgical trauma does not decrease resistance to infection. Eur I Surg. 2002; 164(5): 339-43 .

16. Berger D, Buttenschoen K. Management of abdominal sepsis. Langenbecks. Arch. Surg. 2001; 383(1): 35-43.

17. Van Biesen W, Vanholder R, Vogelaers D, Peleman R, Verschraegen G, Vijt D, Lameire N . The need forva centertailored treatment protocol for peritonitis. Perit. Dial Int . 2003; 18(3): 274-81.

18. Vipond MN et al. Evaluation of fine catheter aspiration citology of the peritoneum or an adjunct to decision making in the acute abdomen. Br. I. Surg. 1990; 77: 86-87.

19. Celdran Uriarte A. Bases para el empleo del lavado peritoneal como terapia adyuvante en la peritonitis. Ann. Surg. 2004; 216(2): 136-45.

20. Liberan A, Correnti SF, Paganelli MF, Antoniti G, Mercati U . [Mannhein Index in the prognisis and treatment of acute peritonitis ] MINERVA . CHIR. 2003; 53 (5): 385-9.

21. Saggi BH, Sugerman HI, Ivantury RR. Bloomfield GL Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Trauma. 2004; 45(3): 597-609 .

22. Hemsley C, Eykyn SI. Pneumococcal peritonitis in previously healthy adults: case report and review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003; 27(2): 376-9 .

23. Fraidle L, Gorban Brennan N, Kliger A, Tinkelstein T. Differing autcomes of gram–positive and gram–negative peritonitis. Am. I. Kidney. Dis. 2004; 32(4): 623-8 .

24. An VK. Method forvdrainagecof abdominal cavity in disseminated forms of peritonitis. Khirurgüa.– Mosk. 2004(7): 53-4.

Published

2008-10-19

How to Cite

1.
Sánchez Castillo E, Vargas La O F, Domínguez Viltres B. Peritoneal biopsy as criteria to interrupt programed peritoneal lavage. RM [Internet]. 2008 Oct. 19 [cited 2025 Jun. 4];12(4). Available from: https://revmultimed.sld.cu/index.php/mtm/article/view/1870

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES