Clinical, humoral and imaging variables useful for the diagnosis of persistent peritonitis

Authors

  • Juan Manuel Vargas Oliva Hospital Provincial Universitario Carlos Manuel de Céspedes. Bayamo.
  • Arlene Arias Aliaga Hospital Provincial Universitario Carlos Manuel de Céspedes. Bayamo.
  • Antonio Lázaro Alcantú Reyes Hospital Provincial Universitario Carlos Manuel de Céspedes. Bayamo.

Keywords:

Persistent peritonitis, Surgery.

Abstract

Introduction: peritonitis, general or localized inflammatory process of the peritoneal membrane; they bring with them a series of local intra-abdominal and general disorders that threatens the patient's life in a potential way, left untreated more than 90% of patients die.

Objective: to evaluate the usefulness of postoperative clinical, humoral and imaginological variables, vital for the early diagnosis of persistent intra-abdominal infection.
Method: An analytical, cohort, prospective and longitudinal observational study was carried out in 45 patients older than 15 years undergoing surgery for diffuse suppurative secondary peritonitis (PSSD) and who were reoperated with the diagnostic impression of persistent peritonitis of which some developed and others do not, in the period from September 2014 to April 2018.

Results: For the early diagnosis of persistent peritonitis in patients operated with suppurative peritonitis, prereintervention heart rate, postoperative spontaneous abdominal pain maintained in the first 48 hours and post-operative pain after abdominal decompression were the most significant findings.

Conclusions: the postoperative pain to decompression of the abdomen acquired a predictive value of reoperation for the first 48 hours of surgery and its appearance increased by 6 times the risk of presenting a persistent peritonitis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Mesa Izquierdo O, Ferrer Robaina H, Mora Batista R, Matos Ramos YA, Travieso Peña G. Morbilidad y mortalidad por peritonitis secundaria en el servicio de cirugía. Rev Cubana Cir 2019; 58(2): e794.

2. San Juan P, Pérez A, Cornelio Barrientos A. Aspectos clínicos y microbiológicos de la peritonitis asociada a diálisis peritoneal en pacientes adultos con insuficiencia renal crónica en el Servicio de Urgencias. Rev Chilena Infectol 2018; 35(3): 225-232.

3. La Rosa Armero Y, Matos Tamayo ME, Rodríguez Fernández Z. Características de las reintervenciones en un servicio de cirugía general. MEDISAN 2017; 21(2): 192-200.

4. Betancourt Cervantes JR. Nuevo índice predictivo para relaparotomías. [Internet]. Santa Clara: Hospital Militar Clínico Quirúrgico Docente Comandante Manuel Fajardo Rivero; 2016. [citado 8/9/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwiDw53jk6nnAhWHv1kKHYd4BOIQFjAAegQIAhAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftesis.sld.cu%2Findex.php%3FP%3DDownloadFile%26Id%3D512&usg=AOvVaw02OPdX3SCs0-CP2FNG5C0L

5. Barrera Melgarejo E, Rodríguez Castro M, Borda Luque G, Najar Trujillo N. Valor Predictivo de Mortalidad del Indice de Peritonitis de Mannheim. Rev Gastroenterol Perú 2010; 30(3): 211-215.

6. Sierra RE, Porro Abdo, C, Guindo González VL, Esteban Soto JA. Mortalidad por peritonitis secundaria en la unidad de terapia intensiva. Rev Cub Cir [Internet]. 2018 [citado 8/9/2019]; 57(4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/cir/v57n4/1561-2945-cir-57-04-e732.pdf

7. Sosa Hernández R, Sánchez Portela C, Delgado Fernández JC, Simón Rodríguez L Pastrana Román I. Parámetros clínicos, humorales e imaginológicos en la reintervención por intraabdominal. Rev Cubana Cir [Internet]. 2007 [citado 8/9/2019]; 46(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/cir/v46n3/cir05307.pdf

8. Cirocchi R, Di Saverio S, Weber DG, Abraha I, Randolph J, Arezzo A, Binda GA. Laparoscopic lavage versus surgical resection for acute diverticulitis with generalised peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21(2): 93-110.

9. Angenete E, Bock D, Rosenberg J, Haglind E. Laparoscopic lavage is superior to colon resection for perforated purulent diverticulitis-a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32(2): 163-169.

10. Valdivia García L, Morera Pérez M. Estudio de pacientes ingresados por peritonitis en el Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso. Rev hab cienc méd 2018; 17(1): 91-102.

11. Ruler O, Boermeester MA. Surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis: A continuing problem. Chirurg 2017; 88(Suppl 1): 1-6.

12. Brillantino A, Andreano M, Lanza M, D'Ambrosio V, Fusco F, Antropoli M, et al. Advantages of Damage Control Strategy With Abdominal Negative Pressure and Instillation in Patients With Diffuse Peritonitis From Perforated Diverticular Disease. Surg Innov 2019; 26(6): 656-661.

13. Yamada A, Kasahara K, Ogawa Y, Samejima K, Eriguchi M, Yano H, Mikasa K, Tsuruya K. Peritonitis due to Moraxella osloensis: A case report and literature review. J Infect Chemother 2019; 25(12): 1050-1052.

Published

2020-02-05

How to Cite

1.
Vargas Oliva JM, Arias Aliaga A, Alcantú Reyes AL. Clinical, humoral and imaging variables useful for the diagnosis of persistent peritonitis. RM [Internet]. 2020 Feb. 5 [cited 2025 Jun. 3];24(1). Available from: https://revmultimed.sld.cu/index.php/mtm/article/view/1585

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES